Saturday - June 24, 2017
Home    About    Writers    Links    Contact     RSS

About the Author

John Bladen


How Sweden and the USA Saw Off Australia and Brazil

Written by on July 11, 2011 | 11 Comments »
Posted in World Cups

Sweden v Australia  (Augsburg)

Surprising Australia, who qualified for the second round by virtue of a tenacious victory over Norway on a pair of Kyah Simon goals in their final group game, were in tough against Group C winners undefeated Sweden.

Captain Caroline Seger returned to the Swedish midfield after completing her suspension (2Y) in their final group game.

Sweden started in a relaxed pace, holding possession fairly easily on a hot day in Augsburg.  Australia narrowly avoided disaster in the first ten minutes when a weak back pass by Kim Carroll wasn’t properly corralled by striker Lotta Schelin lurking in the 18yard box.

In the 11th minute, Schelin redeemed herself with a beautiful pass to Sjogran 12 yards out.  She hammered the ball short side on Australia goalkeeper Melissa Barbieri, who managed to get her hands on the ball but could not keep it out of the net.

It was a strong shot, but one an elite goalkeeper should really turn away.

Just after the 15′ mark Sjogran beat right back Elysse Perry (making her first World Cup start) wide then lofted a fine cross to Lisa Dahlkvist just off the six yard box.  Left unmarked, the Swedish sniper made no mistake, heading the ball firmly into the far corner of the net, leaving Barbieri with no chance.

At this point, the game looked to be well and truly over.  The Australian defense had no answer to the pace or ball handling of Sjogran and Schelin.  On 20′ Schelin launched a cross to the head of Oqvist in the six yard box.  This could have put the ribbon on it all,  but Oqvist failed to put the ball in.

Despite being badly outplayed in the first half an hour, Australia regrouped.  Collette McCallum narrowly missed a curling free-kick from 35 yards out with ten minutes left in the half.

And just a minute later, the previously victimized Perry put the Aussies back in the game with a truly magical strike. From a short corner to the right of goalkeeper Lindahl,  Perry hammered the ball over the Swedish defense and picked the top left corner beautifully.

It will be one of the goals of the tournament when all is said and done.

After the break Australia came out racy again.  They held possession well and kept the Swedish attack at bay.

Old habits die-hard, however, and in the 52′ Carroll rolled another soft back pass toward Barbieri.  This time, Schelin had anticipated it.

She intercepted the ball easily, evaded the charging goalkeeper and popped it in the back of the Australian goal to restore Sweden’s two goal margin.  Seldom at this level do players get away with the same mistake more than once.

Just three minutes later, Schelin found herself alone behind the defense after a perfectly timed pass and run.  Unfortunately, the lines official flagged her incorrectly for offside.

While the officiating has been very good in the tournament thus far, many legitimate scoring opportunities have been flagged by the lines officials.  The ‘close’ flagging has been so consistent across the groups and officiating crews that I find myself wondering if this might have been something that FIFA asked for (IE: when in doubt, flag all close calls regardless)?

Australia created a few chances late in the game (Simon headed wide in the 62nd, de Vanna beat Lindahl in the 66th but then put her curling shot wide of the open goal), but Sweden never looked to be in real trouble.

The only problem for them was a couple of truly foolish yellow cards taken in the last ten minutes, one of which will keep sometime Captain Nilla Fischer (scorer of the winning goal in the group tie with the USA) out of the semifinal.

At this stage of a tournament, taking unnecessary yellow cards for yapping at the officials when the game is won is simply unforgivable.  Hopefully Sweden will not regret these errors.

Brazil v USA  (Dresden)

With hosts Germany despatched, the major attention was focused on the two remaining traditional heavyweights left in the quarterfinals.

Pia Sundhage’s US team had endured an unusually circuitous route to the knockout round having needed two last chance knockout qualifiers (Costa Rica & Italy) to get into the World cup, and faced the Group D winners Brazil by virtue of losing 2-1 to Sweden in Group C.

Despite world number one ranking coming in, the USA clearly seemed ripe for the taking.

Playing a somewhat out of fashion attacking 3-4-3 system with central defender Daiane in what amounts to a sweeper role, Brazil cruised through their group beating Norway & Equatorial Guinea 3-0 after opening the tournament with a surprisingly close 1-0 win over Australia.

After years of promise (and the five time women’s player of the year, Marta, on form), Brazil looked like they were finally ready to defeat their nemesis.

For the US, the three player back line Brazil plays presented plenty of opportunity.  With Wambach notionally a lone striker with Rodriguez in support, Sundhage used Heather O’Reilly and Lauren Cheney pushed forward at the wing to draw out the centre backs and create space for Wambach in the middle.

With Fabiana and Maurine (both listed as defenders) playing wide midfield roles for Brazil, the US frequently forced them back to provide cover in the corners.

The action started in the worst possible way for Brazil.  Just after the 1′ mark US midfielder Shannon Boxx crossed the ball into the Brazil area.

Daiane’s clearance attempt went badly wrong.  The ball shanked off the side of her foot straight into her own net, putting the South Americans down almost from the opening whistle.

After this, the match settled into a messy and disorganized period.  Brazil, in fact, didn’t record their first shot on the US goal until the 37th minute.  A minute later, Fabiana intercepted a Rodriguez pass just on the US 18yd box and broke wide toward net.  She launched a high ball over Hope Solo, but it bounced harmlessly off the bar.

Just before the break, the play began to go against Brazil.  Rangy forward Abby Wambach was fouled by Brazilian Captain Aline.  In truth, Wambach did go down rather easily, but Aline was carded for the foul (a harsh decision) and Marta, outraged by the yellow, stood over Wambach barking and then castigated referee Jacqui Melksham (Australia) forcefully for good measure.

Melksham understandably tired of this rather quickly and issued a yellow to Marta as well.  These are the kind of unnecessary errors that pave the road to ruin, player of the year or not.

The second half began relatively quietly by comparison.  Whistles and catcalls from the fans were evident as the level play degraded.  With the wide MF players for Brazil tracking back and shutting down the US attack, Sundhage first moved Lauren Cheney into a more central role, then subbed her for Megan Rapinoe in the 54th.  This would prove to be an inspired decision.

Then came a period of pressure from Brazil.  Just on 60′, Cristiane pulled up just outside the area and floated a lovely curling left footer toward goal.  It was not wide enough to beat Solo cleanly, though she bungled the save, dropped the ball and then watched it roll harmlessly away from the open goalmouth before grabbing it again.

In the 65th minute, the first of the match “moments’ occurred.   Marta, attacking the US goal from the left, lobbed the ball perfectly over Rachel Buehler & Christie Rampone, then ran around them, breaking in on net.

Buehler, having little option, obstructed her and Marta went down (theatrically, some would say).  The referee did not hesitate in awarding a penalty, and also issued a straight red card to Buehler for denying what she deemed to be a certain goal scoring opportunity.

The replay seemed to support the awarding of a penalty, but the red card seemed harsh given the nature of the foul.  Certainly Buehler obstructed Marta.

Whether she actually took her down is another matter.  Additionally, two other defenders and the goalkeeper were closing on the free ball.

While Marta might have retaken possession and scored, no-one can know for certain that none of the other three wouldn’t have beaten her to it.

The immediate drama was far from over, however.  Cristiane hit a good ball toward the right side of goal and Solo leapt to save it brilliantly.

While the US were celebrating the PK save, referee Melksham ordered the kick retaken.  She had, in fairness, warned Solo to stay on her line very clearly prior to the PK.  However, the replay showed that Solo had moved laterally along the line, not forward of it appreciably.

If that were the call, it was unduly harsh.  When Solo complained, she too was carded.  Information later came that the retake may have been due to encroachment.  If so, that might have been an even less valid reason for the call.  Nonetheless, Marta lined up for the rekick and made no mistake, Brazil were level at 1.

Now down to 10, the US looked in trouble. With a full 25 minutes left in regulation we might have expected Brazil to press forward  Amazingly, though, this did not happen.

The remainder of the match saw a return to the tentative ‘chess match’ approach that both teams had started the second half with.  Daiane’s unhappy experience continued in the 3rd minute of stoppage time when Morgan hammered the ball into her midsection from close range.

At that, Melksham whistled the end of 90 minutes.  Extra time for the third instance in the quarterfinals.

Immediately into extra time, Marta one timed a pass from the wing, lobbing the ball over Solo into the far side of the net.  It was a fine goal, if perhaps fortunate, by the game’s best player.

In the 97th, Abby Wambach narrowly missed putting the US back in front on a brilliant shot low and left on the Brazilian goal.  Andreia’s outstretched fingers just pushed it wide.

The game again went relatively quiet as Brazil looked to preserve the win.  They began time-wasting relatively early – an unfortunate election that cheapened what looked like being a historic victory for them.

The greatest offender was Erika, who stayed down for a full 3 minutes of the final 7 in extra time.  No sooner had she been stretchered off than she leapt off to her feet and ran to the 4th official, ready to return.

The referee rightly carded her for this offense, but the real punishment for Brazil would come in the form of a full 3 minutes of stoppage time added.

With just 90 seconds of stoppage time to go, the second of this game’s great moments occurred.

It came from strong run down the left flank by Megan Rapinoe (who’s set piece kicks had been a highlight for the US since she was brought on), there followed a beautifully floated cross to the head of Abby Wambach who hammered home the finish, levelling the match at 2 in it’s final moments.

Andreia had rushed out to take the cross but was obstructed by her own defender (the unfortunate Daiane playing Wambach onside from the sweeper’s position).

Absent interference, it is uncertain whether the goalkeeper would have gotten a hand to the ball.  Even for the most ardent Brazil (or just non-US) fan, however, the only comment possible was “wow”.

Wambach scarcely had a few inches to tuck the ball inside the post, but she placed it perfectly.   This match, like England-France before it, would be decided on penalty kicks

Sadly for the embattled Brazilian central defender, her troubles were not behind her.

In the third round of penalty kicks, she launched a kick to the left hand side of Solo’s goal.  The line was good, but the ball was at a perfect height to be saved.

Solo stuck out her right hand while launching herself through the air and knocked the ball outside the right hand post.

It would be the only save made.

The Americans potted their next two chances and Brazil found themselves on their way back home wondering how they had been beaten.

You can get updates through RSS (top of the page), follow at Twitter BobbySoccerRep, or on Facebook

You can also find other Soccer Report contributors on Twitter by following this link.

11 responses to “How Sweden and the USA Saw Off Australia and Brazil”

  1. Erik says:

    Pretty good analysis of USA/Brazil

    I used to work in the Media and in Sports Broadcasting. I took pride in my work. If I had anything to do with the Monday, July 11, FSR I would have quit ON THE SPOT!

    If not the most disgraceful FSR EVER – not far from it.

    USA/Brazil should have OPENED Segment #2. Save me the Copa hilites – FSR is aired in the USA – meaning USA/Brazil should have opened Segment #2 since that is the TOP Sports Story here – and thus in the game. To save it until the beginning of the last 30 minutes is embarrassing to EVERYONE associated with the show. I used to work with Jason Wormser (Bobby knows who he is) and I know he is better than this – or so I thought.

    And then to show a Score Panel of Germany/Japan and see it read Germany/France – knowing the show is taped ahead of time – is just as bad.

    Do something right or don’t do it at all. If this is the production value we are going to get on the FSR – just get rid of it. No show at all would have been far better than the embarrassmnet we saw on Monday.

  2. Soccerlogical says:

    So Wormser from “Revenge of the Nerds” grew up and became Fox Soccer, Head of Production eh? You would think that jocks and the sports world would be the last industry he would enter.

    As for the unprofessional score panel error, I’m thinkin it was that new guy Asa…. just somethin’ bout him.

    At least Michelle is back… I adore her! 🙂

  3. Erik says:

    SL – Jason Wormser is one of the smartest and most creative people in the industry and a good hire by FSC.

    As for Asa – we better not get too used to seeing him. He isn’t long for the FSR and I think everyone knows it – including him. He looks as uncomfy as can be in front of the camera and looks like he is moments away from being sent to the Electric Chair. He needs to loosen up – a few shots before the show wouldn’t be so bad with him. He is so straight laced if he sat on a “Yard Stick” he would get Brain Damage.

  4. Al Harris says:

    Just a thought about the FSR’s placing of the USA/Brazil coverage behind the Copa coverage. Is the report really prepared for the American market or is it actually a Canadian oriented production which might explain not leading w/ the big story from the WWC? I really don’t understand it even from that viewpoint though as at least the Canadians made the final 16 even if they did go out after the group stages. You’d think the major story in both markets would be the WWC at least until the Copa gets down to the knockout stages. So far as the incorrect graphic, sadly it’s only what we’ve come to expect from FSR’s production values. It’s a rare week that goes by without at least one clanger like that.

  5. Sandra says:

    Hate to say this but I think Erik has a point. On Sunday night the Colombia-Bolivia Copa America game was repeatedly captioned “Colombia-Brazil.” It’s not like this is a rare screw-up, I wouldn’t say anything if it were. A few times a week I see some mistake on the captions/text somewhere on the screen.

    Good write-up of both games.

  6. Soccerlogical says:

    Everyone has brought up valid points but as long as Bobby and Michelle are part of the show it remains top notch and the rest just bells and whistles.

  7. John Bladen says:

    I’m wondering if some of you would expand on your comments re: the order in which the highlights were aired?

    Is the issue that the US Women’s game should have been the bigger draw (for the North American audience) or that you feel the WWC is a bigger competition? Or that the WWC was in the QF phase (further advanced than Copa America)?

    Since no-one has mentioned it thus far, I’ll add that the U17 world cup final was actually on over the weekend, and outdrew everything else in terms of attendance. I’m guessing that deciding ‘what leads’ isn’t as easy as we fans think…. probably quite subjective. And somebody somewhere is always going to be unhappy about whatever decision is made.

  8. Erik says:

    John – NO ONE CARES about the U17 games – NO ONE! It might have outdrew the WWC in attendance but Roseanne was on TV for many years and IT SUCKED!

    The USA/Brazil game was one of the best GAMES EVER – Male of Female and one of the most exciting games EVER! It was something highly discussed at the Water Cooler Monday and twitter blew up with people commenting on it – Celebs especially.

    I doubt 5 people in the USA knew the U17 games were going on this weekend. When ESPN leads off their SportsCenter with hilities of this game – that tells ya all ya need to know. OK – so they are biased because they showed it but these hilites NOT leading off Segment #2 is disgraceful

    IF (more like WHEN) USA beats France on Wednesday it means Sunday will be the Championship Game. I HOPE the FSR will LEAD with the USA WWC Final Game. It should – but if it doesn’t it won’t shock me. I realize the FSR is done with a small staff and thus errors can be made but the errors that are being made is stuff Interns new to the Biz wouldn’t make. Most games are done several hours before the show meaning Score panels and all were done way before air time and to constantly get those Panels wrong is something that should be costing people their job

    I do agree that what to lead with is subjective most times but Sunday and Monday was not one of those times. Same for Wednesday – USA/France is the no brainer lead story of the show – after any EPL moves. Having said that I doubt it will happen

  9. Soccerlogical says:

    ERIK – Why are you so sure that USA beats France… you do realize that the French side is comprised of mainly Lyon players who just won the CL right? Not to mention the mental and physical drain of AET and one less day rest!

  10. Erik says:

    France isn’t all that good. Never should have beaten England. I compare this all to the 1980 Men’s Olympic Hockey team. They beat Russia on Friday 4-3 to play Finland for the Gold Medal on Sunday. A loss to the Fins would have made the Russia win meaningless and after 2 periods they trailed 2-1 but scored 3 in 3P to win 4-2 and win the Gold.

    Same thing here. A USA loss to their hairy, non-bathing, smelly opponents will make Sunday’s win meaningless.

    USA is Ranked #1 for a reason. Might not be easy but this is USA’s WC to win – and Sunday they will do that when they exact big time revenge on the Swedes.

    For those who like to watch the game with some “Matchsticks” on the game – I see an O/U of 2.5 but with Under -175. If you can find a U2 with juice close to +100 I LOVE that. USA 1-0 is your final

  11. John Bladen says:

    Erik: The approximately 100,000 people in Azteca stadium for the U17 final likely disagree with your assertion that “no-one” cares about that tournament.

    As far as a ‘tv draw’, it’s possible that the WWC would be ahead of the U17 tournament worldwide, I’m really not sure. I think you’ll find that the Copa America is a bigger tv property than both of the others, however.

    Secondly, denigrating the French players in the way you did is an explicit violation of the house rules (they are right below the comments section, please read them). It’s hate speech, and it’s appalling. Grow up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

House Rules

Please refrain from posting comments that;

  • Attempt to demean, intimidate or bully fellow readers
  • Are racist, sexist, homophobic, sexually explicit, intolerant or otherwise abusive
  • Includes language likely to offend or attempts to try and circumvent this request
  • Could be considered spam

The House reserves the right to delete any such comments and to block further participation on the site.

Soccer Report Extra
© copyright 2010. All rights reserved.
Designed and Developed by:
Bills'eye + Underscorefunk Design